What are "crimes against the financial interests of the Union"? Why the EU has "exclusive competence to conclude international agreements"? What is to rely on "sustainable development of the Earth," and what "any discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation? What is meant by "forms of crime affecting a common interest covered by a Union policy"? Why Member States' place at the disposal of the common security and military? These and many other questions are the consequences of associating with the Lisbon Treaty - the EU's highest legal act.
In this article I will analyze the whole of the Lisbon Treaty because it is a very comprehensive document and - We should not delude be - boring. However, the sheer volume of dull, dry and devoid of aesthetic rules, you can sometimes find a "relish" a man who can surprise and even frighten. Feel free to read some excerpts of the controversial act, which, according to me and many other nationalists, deprived of Polish independence.
Consider what is clear from these passages and then - in the context of the objectives of the Lisbon Treaty - the European Union. In my opinion, this document is proof that the EU is not a confederation, federation only. Dream come true for people who in the fifties of the twentieth century dreamed of creating the United States of Europe - an alternative and competition for the U.S.. Reading and analyzing fragments of TL, do not forget the terrified face of Lech Kaczynski, which was captured in the recording of October 10, 2009 ("Signing the Lisbon Treaty" - YouTube.com). Remember also that "This Treaty is concluded for an indefinite period."
's quotations from the Treaty of Lisbon bear my comments:
"The Union is founded on the values \u200b\u200bof respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities . Values These are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men "
The passage just quoted, is a collection of very original and very little talking generalities, which very often wipe his throat politicians from different countries. About freedom, human dignity, human rights and democratic values, saying everyone - Barack Obama, Donald Tusk, Alexander Lukashenko, and the constitution of North Korea. Presented quotation ends with a boring and trite statement, saying the equal status of women and men. This is a truly demagogic eyewash, since other parts of the Lisbon Treaty show a clear faworyzację women at the expense of men:
"These areas of crime are the following: terrorism, human trafficking and sexual exploitation of women and children, illicit drug trafficking, illicit arms trafficking, money laundering laundering, corruption, counterfeiting of means of payment, computer crime and organized crime "
" Fighting trafficking human beings, especially women and children "
phrase" sexual exploitation of women and children "is so clear that it can be inferred that the man who is a victim of such use not count on help from the Union. Ba! After reading the above quotation one may wonder whether the harm of the male sex in general is a crime - after all, there is no question about it in the list of offenses! We have explicitly written that the sexual exploitation of women and children is wrong. Nowhere, however, makes no mention of the fact that the sexual abuse of men it is wrong.
Discrimination? You bet it is! Much przychylniejszy for guys is the second quotation, in which fall the words "in particular women and children." This formulation does not exclude anyone, but it indicates a clear faworyzację women and children. Let no one say that the European Union there is a phenomenon of equality before the law. Because, unfortunately, it is an illusion.
"The Union shall ensure consistency between its policies and activities, taking all of its objectives and in accordance with the principle of conferral of powers"
Consistency? We have just shown that there is no consistency!
"In defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall aim to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation"
Discrimination based on sex has a said. I wonder, however, described in this passage, "to combat discrimination based on sexual orientation." Are these words also apply to "discrimination" Civil Status Offices and with the passing of children for adoption?
"In its relations with the Union shall uphold and promote its values \u200b\u200band interests and contribute to the protection of its citizens. It contributes to peace, security, sustainable development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights, in particular the rights of the child, as well as to strict observance and development of international law, the principles of the Charter of the United Nations'
What is "sustainable development of the Earth"? I know what the development of science, technology, culture and art, but about the "development of the Earth," I had never heard before. How can you develop the planet? Or maybe the concept of "Earth" there is nature, nature? If so, you should ask the question: whether "the development of the Earth" is the promotion of GMOs - Genetically Modified Organisms? Dear Readers, read each of the Codex Alimentarius and the dark side of Monsanto (Stopcodex.pl, Zbrodniarze.com)! Consider also, it is declared by the EU "to protect the rights of the child" to actively promote abortion movement (http://www.uniaeuropejska.org/unia/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=564:kontrowersyjne-stanowisko-parlamentu -European-in-the-abortion & catid = 49: Policy & Itemid = 65).
"Enhanced cooperation shall aim to further the objectives of the Union, protect its interests and reinforce its integration process. Such cooperation is open to all Member States at any time, in accordance with Article 280 C of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union "
above quote speaks of as provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, the possibility of political, called" enhanced cooperation ". This "enhanced cooperation" in theory is not mandatory, but - just like it - Resignation of the stretches for a very serious legal consequences:
"In the proceedings of the Council may participate in all Member States, however, the vote involved only members of the Council representing Member States participating in enhanced cooperation. Voting rules are set down in Article 280e of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union "
seen with the naked eye that there is equality, not only in the gray world citizens, but also in the central institutions of the European Union. Oh, where are the beautiful speech about equality and fraternity member States of the EU? Equality and fraternity are in the European Communities, however, the Treaty of Lisbon is destroyed Community:
"Delete paragraph 1 and changes accordingly renumbered accordingly; the entire article, the words of the European Communities shall be replaced by the Union"
Unfortunately, this is just the tip of the iceberg called Brussels oppression. In the EU, no nation can feel free, as each country imposed a number of severe limitations. Here you can not think of meeting their own national needs - you have to be ready for the many sacrifices and accept the superiority of interests of the EU on their own. If the EU's interests are contrary to the native, then you just have to bite the bullet and accept his fate. In no country of the Union is a sovereign state, but a vassal of what is above him,
"Member States shall take any general or specific measures to ensure fulfillment of obligations under the Treaties or the acts of the institutions of the Union. Member States shall facilitate the achievement of the Union's tasks and refrain from taking any measure which could jeopardize the attainment of the objectives Union "
" If, under the procedure referred to in paragraph 3, it is found that the economic policies of the Member State are not consistent with the broad guidelines referred to in paragraph 2, or threaten the proper functioning of economic and monetary union, the Commission may addressed to the Member State concerned warning. The Council, on recommendation from the Commission, may address the necessary recommendations to the Member State "
" Member States shall adopt all measures of national law necessary to implement legally binding acts Union "
Brussels not only unpleasant duties be charged state and humble request command execution, but also claims the right to decide what is permitted and what is not. If a member state wants to do something, it must ask for permission on the European Union. Whether the EU will go on his own, depends entirely on the whim. I think it can be compared to the situation of a minor who - wishing to do something - he must ask parents for permission:
"Before taking any action on the international scene or entering into any commitment which could affect the Union's interests, each Member State shall consult the others within the European Council or the Council. Member States shall ensure, through the convergence of action, the possibility of implementing the Union's interests and values \u200b\u200binternationally. Member States shall show mutual solidarity "
there issues on which Member States have absolutely nothing to say. The Lisbon Treaty is clearly written that certain things are privileges of the Union ... and one more:
"1 The Union has exclusive competence in the following areas:
a) customs union;
b) the establishment of competition rules necessary for the functioning of the internal market;
c) monetary policy for the Member States whose currency is the euro;
d) the conservation of marine biological resources under the common fisheries policy;
e) common commercial policy.
second The Union shall also have exclusive competence to conclude international agreements, if its conclusion is provided in a legislative act of the Union or it is necessary to enable the Union to exercise its internal competence, or insofar as its conclusion may affect common rules or alter their scope "
What is meant by" exclusive competence to conclude international agreements "? Does it mean that the EU can - without the consent of the Polish - a pact that will apply to Poland? Is the EU is our legal representative, similar to the parent, which includes civil law contracts on behalf of the child? Why is the Republic of Poland, instead of being an independent homeland, is so incapacitated? Why do not you have anything to say about the legislation, which the EU imposes on her? What I am describing a situation like medieval princesses, who were forced to enter into arranged marriages.
"Political parties at European level contribute to forming a European awareness and to expressing the will of the citizens of the Union"
In the above quote refers to the European consciousness, but there is no mention of the national consciousness. This "European consciousness" is nothing but the acceptance of the superiority of EU interests the mother tongues - plain conformism and humility towards the political solution, which is above the state and nation. Notice, dear readers, attention to the words "citizens of the Union." Is an international organization may be citizens?
not, giving citizenship lies solely with the states! It may be concluded that the EU is not an international organization, but a federation - the state union, a kind of United States of America. As we know, in the U.S. each state has its own constitution and its own parliament, but is not a sovereign state. Very similar The situation of the European Union, which after the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty in question here was transformed into the United States of Europe.
Anyway, that was its original purpose. The confirmation of this fact can be quoted from the book "Polish History 1914-2000" by Wojciech Roszkowski (OWN, Warsaw 2001): "In Western Europe, matured concepts of integration. At the end of 1953, discussed the draft of a common economic, political and military, whose goal was to be the future United States of Europe ". Rather, whoever said that initially the EU had to be simple international organization, and then suddenly changed course. She's from the very beginning aimed at creating a United States of Europe.
I do not believe that those who pushed us into it, they did not know about it. The EU is a country having its own flag, motto, anthem and holiday (9 May), embassies and citizens. The EU has even the president, as evidenced by the excerpt from the article from the portal Onet.pl: "Today the president of the European Union Herman" (source: http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swiat/prezydenckie-ambicje-aktora-usmialem -August, 1.4251413, wiadomosc.html). Need more evidence of the statehood of the EU? Here you go: at the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the European Communities are on the list of countries are celebrating national holidays in May (http://www.msz.gov.pl/National, Days, 12922.html).
But back to the analysis of fragments of the Treaty of Lisbon. The EU has some ambitions of the military and does not preclude the application of radical measures in order to "achieve the objectives set by the Council." The European Union is also in the military forces member states to sacrifice, requiring them to capture the disposal of its "civilian capacity and the military ":
" Member States in order to realize common security policy and military capabilities available to the Union its civilian and military capabilities, to contribute to the achievement of the objectives set by the Council. Member States which together establish multinational forces may also make them available to the common security and defense policy "
But that's not all. I discussed the Lisbon Treaty contains a vague and undefined words, under which it can pull what you want. My point here about the word "racism and xenophobia", which could be called bad people all the patriotic and nationalist movements in order to compromise and discredit the (interesting fact: in the Stalinist period was called the Office of Public Security Army soldiers, "fascists"):
"The Union shall endeavor to ensure a high level of security through measures to prevent crime, racism and xenophobia and combat the phenomenon, as well as through measures for coordination and cooperation between police and judicial authorities and other relevant bodies, as well as through the mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters and, if necessary, through the approximation of criminal laws "
person carefully reading the Treaty of Lisbon, sooner or later come across the mention of" crimes against the financial interests of the Union "mysterious and Europol, which prosecute these crimes:
" initiation of criminal investigations as well as proposing the initiation of prosecutions conducted by competent national authorities, particularly those relating to crimes against the financial interests of the Union "
"In order to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with a special legislative procedure, may establish a European Prosecutor's Office from Eurojust. The Council shall act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament
"The Prosecutor's Office is responsible for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to court, where appropriate in liaison with Europol, the perpetrators and accomplices in crimes against the financial interests of the Union, as defined by the regulation provided for in paragraph 1 . The Prosecutor's Office is responsible for bring before the competent courts of the Member States, the public prosecution for these crimes, "
I do not know what they are" crimes against the financial interests of the Union "and do not intend to have fun guessing what the authors of the Lisbon Treaty had in mind. I only know that the term "crime against the financial interests of the Union" is as used in the PRL, the expression "crime against the socialist order of the state." However, Europol is called a word. acronym Group (sylabowiec) formed from the names of their European Police - European Police. In the skrótowcu there would be nothing wrong, were it not that it sounds like Newspeak.
Unfortunately, the European Union does not want to be limited only to prosecute crimes against its financial interests. " As is apparent from the Lisbon Treaty, Europol (European Police) also has to cope with "forms of crime affecting a common interest covered by the policy of the Union." I do not know and will not know what's going on here:
"Europol's mission is to support and strengthen activities of the police and other law enforcement authorities of Member States, as well as their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by the policy of the Union "
Many people claim that the EU is a germ of a world government, a unique monster, which in future will consume the entire Earth and create a global dictatorship called the new order of the World - New World Order. It's hard to say whether this is true or just a conspiracy theory. But one thing is certain: The European Union supports the globalization and wishes to deepen it.
How dark sound in this context the words of Blessed John Paul II, moreover, a great supporter of the EU: "New World Order, the civilization of love, can be achieved" ("Pope John Paul 2's New World Order Speech at Gandhi's Memorial" - YouTube.com) ! Supported by Karol Wojtyla, the European Union calls for 'integration into the global economy "and" good governance at the global level ":
" The Union shall define and pursue common policies and actions, and seeks to provide a high degree of cooperation in all fields of international relations, in order: (...)
- to encourage all countries to integrate into the global economy, including through the progressive abolition of restrictions on international trade;
- promote an international system based on stronger multilateral cooperation and good governance at the level of world "
As written, the material presented is only a handful of the most interesting parts of the Lisbon Treaty. If someone wants to read the full text of this document, you may download it for free from:
http://bookshop.europa.eu/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/EU-Bookshop-Site/pl_PL/-/EUR/ViewPublication-Start?PublicationKey=FXAC07306
At the end is worth quoting quote from the book "The Constitutional system of government," written, edited by Paul Khmelnitsky (ed. LexisNexis, Warsaw, 2010): "From the accession to the EU Member States loses about 60% of the legislative powers, in the matter of commercial law - even about 80% ". These words show you what a great extent, the European Union restricts the sovereignty of our country - a country once renowned for patriotism.
Why today, in the twenty-first century, we agree to such oppression? After all, we had to be Winkelried Nations! It seems that the media, propaganda euroentuzjastyczna effectively put to sleep our vigilance and concealed from us the dark side of the EU. I am a student of journalism, so I know the lectures and teaching aids, how great is the power of the media and what the crap you can convince people by the media.
There is a feature film, "Wag the Dog," which shows that television can push even the biggest lie to citizens. TV in the film spreparowała materials relating to the alleged war in Albania. However, in the real world - here in Poland - TV spread false, utopian image of the European Union. It is sad that we gave up crazy, but we can still turn the wrong way and go to the senses. If we abandon the superstitions created by the media, we see the true face of the EU, which has nothing to do with the idyllic image of the popular TV and newspapers.
Natalia Julia Smith,
8-9 May 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment