Woman Showing There Breasts

Historio, keep Lukashenko! Alexandre

heretical poem about Lukashenko

In mid February 2011 I wrote a poem Fri "Alexandre Loukachenko," in which he expressed his support for the incumbent President of the Republic of Belarus. The song, as is not difficult to guess, provoked many emotions among readers, especially surprise, fear and resentment. This reaction was not a surprise to me because many of our compatriots, who for years have been told that Alexander "Back" Lukashenko is the embodiment of all evil, I just can not imagine that you can have on this issue disagree.


Free your minds!

fact that someone says something different than the popular newspapers and television stations, for many Poles a strange thing that run in them a violent defensive reaction. However, I insist on the opinion that a wise man should think for themselves, and not repeat what he was serving well-known and popular journalists. Let me in this column, justify why I support the current (or rather: the eternal), the President of Belarus. Reflections that are here present, they are my private thoughts, arising from the possession of reason and understanding that the comments of media celebrities are not absolute truths. Down with dogma created by the "talking heads" on TV! As wise people say, "Turn it off TV, tune in thinking!


Nothing happens without a reason

In the popular media presented as a mad tyrant Lukashenko, who - with pure sadism - deals only with madness, how to poison the lives of its citizens, neighboring countries of Belarus, and in general the whole world . But we often forget that if you lead the so-called Alexander. strong-arm policy, it must be a reason for doing so (yes, yes, my dear! may be hard to believe, but there is no smoke without fire!). If we consider carefully, what is the reason for this, it will reach the startling conclusion that Lukashenko comes to defending the political independence of their country. So - how not to look - to defend the independence of their homeland. Can there be objective szczytniejszy and noble, and at the same sanctifying even radical measures? Can there be an urgent and important than the protection of their home country before him threatening factors? Respond to any of these questions "yes" would imply a deficit of patriotism.


E. Union

borders with Belarus, a powerful and dangerous creature - The European Union, who began his "career" as a confederation (union member), and which in 2009 transformed itself into a federation (state union of) similar to the United States of America. This solution - or rather, cancer, and it is malicious - leads quite aggressive and wants to expand their territories, if not formally, informally, by issuing commands, and so-called "good advice" to other countries. The European Union claims the right to decide how they should proceed governments of several countries, and when he is denied, he begins to blackmail these countries through a variety of diplomatic and economic sanctions.


As mourners Lucifer

One of these states is the Republic of Belarus. RB, who does not want to be anektowana to the EU (specifically writing about the annexation, not the accession!), An incredibly annoying that a political juggernaut. The European Union is angry that Belarus, or rather its charismatic leader, is in the nose of its orders and does not want to adapt to her whim. EU's attitude can be represented by the old occult symbol that represents teary eye, and that means "cry of Lucifer over those who are still outside its influence "(source: Gbacik.is.net.pl). The EU knows that the Republic of Belarus will be independent of them as long as long as Lukashenko government has, therefore doing everything in its power to move this brave patriot from power.


Does the European Union pays antyprezydencką opposition?

One of her tricks is supposed to pay the so-called. democratic opposition, which seeks to ensure that topple Lukashenka, to change state policy and as a result annex zone of Belarus to the European Union (or so says main interest, Mr. Alexander, who planted the EU countries, Poland and Germany, to actively support the anti-presidential camp.) If this is true - hopefully not! - That we are dealing with some form of corruption. And it is extremely perfidious corruption as an extremely focused on the implementation of antypatriotycznego purpose.


Demon + monster + reason = demonstration

I do not have any evidence that would confirm the thesis that the Belarusian opposition is paid by a foreign power. However, I have evidence that the opponents of the Lukashenko supported the European Union and want to see Belarus become her part. In the pictures of the outrageous demonstration (demon + monster + reason = demonstration), which took place in Minsk, 19 December 2010 year, it is clear, as rising opposition Union flag. It's hard to more clearly show their support for a political solution, which seeks to wrap itself around your finger Belarus! Absolutely not saying that the brutal pacification of this demonstration was a good thing. I'm not a fan of violence, did not like it when someone poses the pain and fear, although far from me to the naive, puerile pacifism. And Lukashenka? Eh ... What is a patriot does not do in self-defense Motherland!


What fascinates me in the form of Mr Lukashenko?

Mr. Alexander as the only politician in Europe fiercely defends the freedom of their country, building up any pressure and blackmail on the part of any power of the European Union (resp. USA!). It is incredibly strong, resolute and courageous leader who gives the impression that he was willing to do everything possible to preserve the independence of their homeland. When one reads his speeches, the impression that this man is a remarkable relationship with their country, that he feels bonded to him that any word criticism directed at the State treats as a personal affront. Such an attitude is not uncommon for the leaders of authoritarian states, although he does (at least for me) a great impression. How is this different from the attitude of politicians in democratic countries, who sometimes behave like a dead cogs in a complex state machine! Cogs, which at any moment can be replaced and whose disappearance will not affect the operation of the entire machine.


Completion

I think everyone who understands the idea of \u200b\u200bpatriotism and good wishes to the Belarusian land, should appreciate the activity Lukashenko. Polish independence could not be saved, but might be able to save the independence of our nearest neighbor, Belarus? The constant blackmailing of the Republic of Belarus by the European Union I am very concerned about, the more that RB is a part of the Slavs, the Eastern region of our brothers. Kibicujmy Belarus in the struggle to maintain political independence! We have suffered defeat, but our eastern neighbor, is still based on foreign forces. As the army of Leonidas at the Battle of Thermopylae ...


Natalia Julia Smith,
February 24, 2011 year

Does Grecian Work On Short Hair

Loukachenko

Few leaders today is, What
protect their country's independence
I despise foreign influences,
Because sin is their submission.

Few can stand upright,
While others kneel before the Union
And in return for large donations
His humble waive rights.

Few leaders have the strength to stay with the
its needed,
Few have audacity to despise
Flank, meaninglessness shameful.

Few are able to survive the gales and storms
internal And
painful pressure, blackmail and threats
external.

Few have as much energy,
To take upon his shoulders the whole country
I care to foreign agents
access to power did not.

Few are capable of opening
say what he thinks and feels.
Few can be themselves, when the rest of the PR
ruled forever.

Few recognize that the distribution of
begins by democracy
Glorifying mediocrity, selfishness,
acts perpetrated, not a state right.

Ah, one of those respectable "few"
Loukachenko Are you Alexandre!
That it should take an example,
And not from Tymochenko, Iouchtchenko!

stronger and more persistent
Than Hosni Mubarak, which got cold feet.
more capable and more efficient
Than Tusk, who zadłużył Poland.

Patriot, rejects the NPS
Globalism, EU, World Government.
not playing in politpoprawność,
It is a proud and honorable.

I respect him very much and I like
Although it is not from my homeland. Long live
and stands at his
Our Neighbor, the miracle of the Son, Slavs!


15 February 2011

Can Shaving Cause Outbreaks

For lovers of the Smolensk disaster

February 9, 2011, the


Dear fans of the Smolensk disaster!


Before turning to the particulars, write a few words about yourself, you know who appeals to your conscience. My name is Natalia Julia Smith, was born on 19 February 1991 year, and I am a student of Journalism and Communication. My belief is an explosive mix of patriotism, nationalism, conservatism, moral, antyfeminizmu, antydemokratyzmu, terceryzmu and atheism. Officially, I do not belong to any political party, but loosely cooperate with the Polish National Party and sometimes published their articles in its official organ of the press, the weekly "Only Poland."

addition PPN-u, I like Polish National Rebirth and various nationalist organizations operating in our country (National Radical Camp, Camp Great Polish, Polish Youth). I've included this information in case you happened to one of ubzdurało that I am "a fan Tusk / Palikot" "Russian spy" or "agent does not know what." From experience I know that some worthy of your group have a tendency to hasty to judge other people, we will be careful and put its declaration worldview at the beginning of the letter.

I am writing to you because of behavior that are dopuszczaliście over the last 10 months, provoked in me a deep disgust and disapproval. After the crash of the presidential / government aircraft, which took place on 10 April 2010 in the vicinity of Smolensk, many of you fell into a veritable hysteria. This in turn - having originated in a very strong experiences, such as shock, fright or despair - sometimes turned into a radical and irrational ideology. No sense of good taste and proper assessment of events, began to put the victims of air disaster on a par with the national heroes who sacrificed their lives for Poland. Ceased to recognize that there is a vast difference between the death of someone who was killed in the accident, and the death of someone who was murdered at the behest of external or internal enemy, only because he fought in defense of their homeland. Has blurred the line between you and the martyrdom of the case arising from the heroism and patriotism.

When you write about the victims of Smolensk case, often you use the word "died" referring to - according to the dictionary meaning - the people who died in battle or other combat. In this way not only to ridicule the victims of the April crash (because the word "died" in this context sounds like a sneer), but also diminish the merit of those who actually fell in the battle for a free Poland. About someone who was killed in an accident (regardless of whether air or some other), we can not say that it is dead. The fallen soldiers were eg the Polish Army who lost their lives in the September Campaign in 1939. The fallen were members of the Kosciuszko Insurrection killed in the eighteenth century. Had fallen - in a sense - the soldiers of the Army and the National Armed Forces, who after World War II have been falsely accused of various crimes, subjected to inhuman torture and liquidated by the Communist authorities.

But no, the Zeus, transport disaster victims! Are the people who died in an accident of the Polish coach near Grenoble, is also killed? No, it's just an unfortunate incident the victim on the road! Another thing: calling the Smolensk disaster "second Katyn" or "Katyn 2010" is insult to the thousands of Polish officers who were murdered at Katyn by the Soviet NKVD. How do you not ashamed to compare comparable things? How do you not ashamed to put an aircraft accident on a par with the massacre, which many historians consider a genocide? Do you really not see that your statements are brazenly bizarre - on one hand funny and absurd, on the other sad and disturbing!

As if this were not enough, after 10 April 2010, began to openly glorify Kaczynski, called him the Great Pole, Great Patriot and Martyr. Putting policy equally plain with the Great Poles, Great Patriots and martyrs, such as even Captain Witold Pilecki, again profaned the latter. From your statement that the man who was killed in an airplane accident, you should be the same honor and glory, like him who voluntarily penetrated to the concentration camp Auschwitz-Birkeneu, organized the resistance movement there, and then ran away, gave her the information gained superiors, took part in the Warsaw Uprising, and after the war, was arrested by the Communists and killed after a brutal interrogation, conducted by J. Rozanski - cruellest criminal in the history of the Office of Public Safety. Rather than put

monuments Witold Pilecki, demanded monuments Lech Kaczynski - the victims' disaster in the skies! Was the cult practiced by the Kaczynski is all the more shocking that this policy signed the Treaty of Lisbon (the document that gave the EU a legal personality, which turned it from the confederation into a federation. The document, which caused great harm not only Poland but also 26 other countries) . What does that say about you and your supposed patriotism? If you absolutely want to place monuments to people who lived in our times, it start by honoring Martin B. nineteen Boy, which - in north London - was murdered by trzydziestotrzyletniego Dutchman, as opposed to the Polish nation pomawianiu of calling the World War II (Source: narodowcy.net / murder-for-defense -polskiej-historii/2011/02/08).

It's probably all I wanted to write in this letter. We beg you, that you carefully consider my words and took them to heart. I appeal to you to sense and failure to conduct, by which - probably unwittingly - image largest Polish Heroes and Martyrs. In addition to behaviors, which allow yourself to 10 April 2010, you can not pass by, because they constitute a serious breach of moral standards tudziez principles of social coexistence.


Sincerely, Julia Smith Natalia



PS Why do not you cease to accuse the Russians of deliberately causing the disaster Smolensk? Really I do not like your speech, which incites hatred towards the Russian people!